Fairness Rocks News Divergence instead of guidance: the Article 17 implementation discussion in 2020


Fairness Rocks News Divergence instead of guidance: the Article 17 implementation discussion in 2020

Home Industry News Divergence instead of guidance: the Article 17 implementation discussion in 2020

Author: Paul Keller

Date: January 22, 2021

Original Source: Kluwer Copyright Blog

Industry News

Divergence instead of guidance: the Article 17 implementation discussion in 2020

It is less than five months until the implementation deadline for the 2019 Copyright in the digital single market directive (DSM Directive). So far, the pace of implementation has been relatively slow (no doubt at least in part due to the massive challenges that governments and the cultural sector are facing as a result of the pandemic). Still, with the implementation deadline in sight it seems worth summarising where the discussion about implementing Article 17, which continues to be the most controversial aspect of the DSM Directive, stands and how the discussion has evolved over the course of 2020.

Read Part 1: http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2021/01/21/divergence-instead-of-guidance-the-article-17-implementation-discussion-in-2020-part-1/

Read Part 2: http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2021/01/22/divergence-instead-of-guidance-the-article-17-implementation-discussion-in-2020-part-2/